Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to a single large stream with multiple consumers #104

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

t-persson
Copy link
Collaborator

Applicable Issues

Description of the Change

This feels like the more simple approach since creating a stream per testrun would require us to think a lot about security on the CreateStream endpoint. This way ETOS will handle the stream creation itself.

Alternate Designs

Possible Drawbacks

Sign-off

Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1

By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:

(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
have the right to submit it under the open source license
indicated in the file; or

(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
license and I have the right under that license to submit that
work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
in the file; or

(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
it.

(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
this project or the open source license(s) involved.

Signed-off-by: Tobias Persson [email protected]

@t-persson t-persson requested a review from a team as a code owner March 4, 2025 12:36
@t-persson t-persson requested review from fredjn and andmat900 and removed request for a team March 4, 2025 12:36
This feels like the more simple approach since creating a stream
per testrun would require us to think a lot about security on the
CreateStream endpoint. This way ETOS will handle the stream creation
itself.
@t-persson t-persson force-pushed the single-stream-sse-server branch from ebf4db1 to 7e01375 Compare March 6, 2025 14:25
MaxLengthBytes: stream.ByteCapacity{}.GB(2),
MaxAge: time.Second * 10,
MaxAge: time.Hour * 48,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use the configuration parameter instead (test_result_timeout or similar)? I. e. max testrun duration * 2.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Those configuration parameters are in etos library (python).
The MaxAge we set here should be controlled by RabbitMQ policies instead and those policies take precedence over our queue config: https://www.rabbitmq.com/docs/streams#retention

@t-persson t-persson requested a review from andmat900 March 10, 2025 13:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants